Philadelphia sweetened beverage tax still causing heated debate in City Council

PHILADELPHIA (KYW Newsradio) — Philadelphia City Council passed a resolution to study the impact of the soda tax Thursday, but not before heated debate among council members as the tax remains a volatile subject in council. 

While several soda tax supporters said they were voting for the study because they saw no harm in having more information, Councilwoman Helen Gym disagreed.

“I can see through a charade whose purpose is to drum up opposition that will only breed cynicism and distrust on a signature initiative in this city,” Gym said. 

RELATED: Changes to soda tax proposed in City Council, but no details provided 

Councilwoman Cherelle Parker also opposed the study resolution, saying it was unnecessary – council commissions studies all the time without resolutions. She also questioned the timing of the resolution and a companion bill to phase out the soda tax, accusing the sponsors of weaponizing the issue as an election tactic.

“It will significantly impact those people particularly in council districts that are being funded from the (soda) industry,” she said. 

Chief sponsor Maria Quinones-Sanchez denied that she was politically motivated. 

“The timing of this is appropriate because it is until recently that this has been declared lawful,” Quinones-Sanchez said. 

Sanchez lost one of her six co-sponsors on the tax phase-out bill. 

In a letter to the council president, Councilwoman Blondell Reynolds Brown asked that her name be removed from the bill, though she did vote in favor of the study resolution.

more Philly News (For Your Information)

1
Leave a Reply

Leave a Comment

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Joan P Frizzell
Guest
Joan P Frizzell

I personally think that tax payer funded PreK should be in the schools not private off site Centers. Then Teachers will get a living wage and not minimum wage. Money would then support the school.
Also, for parents with more than 1 child, having PreK in the same building as the children in K-5 means – one stop for parents.
There would then be standardization of curriculum.

The current system is funding private centers and has no control over the program.